Thursday, September 2, 2010 1:47pm EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
To many, God and violence seem mutually exclusive. To others, the two are synonymous: Thursday night, as Charles Lee Thornton left his Kirkwood, Missouri home, he reportedly called out, "To God be the glory!"
The next thing anyone heard Thornton say was, "Shoot the mayor!" as he fatally shot two police officers and three city councilpersons. His sixth victim, Kirkwood Mayor Mike Swoboda, is in critical condition.
Thornton has been described by a friend as an educated, positive, church-going man who had been socked with 150 tickets for parking his commercial vehicles in a residential zone. Neither his rowdy appeals to the city council nor legal action in the courts had relieved him of $18,000 in fines and code violations.
As Thornton walked into the Kirkwood city council meeting, another man, 1,260 miles away, was being held without bond, accused of threatening to "shed the blood of the innocent" at the Super Bowl. According to the Associated Press, court documents claim that Kurt William Havelock drove within sight of the University of Phoenix stadium with an AR-15 assault style rifle and 200 rounds of ammunition. He was angry because he had been denied a liquor license.
These are merely the latest in a series of incidents that led me to conclude that there is a link between violent behavior and a person's perceptions of God--more accurately, a person's misperceptions of what God is and what God does. Far too many, particularly those who take the Bible literally, believe that God is vengeful, conditionally forgiving, solves problems by severely punishing or killing people, and mandates the live sacrifice of innocents.
I drew this conclusion from my observations as a journalist and spiritual sleuth. However, until minutes ago, I knew of no scientific research. Then I discovered a March 5, 2007 news release slugged: "When God sanctions violence, believers act more aggressively."
Researchers at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Provo, Utah and Vrije University in the Netherlands conducted two studies to determine whether reading violent scriptures increases aggressive behavior, especially among those who believe that the Bible is entirely true. The first study involved BYU students. The second study involved students in Amsterdam.
Both groups were instructed to read a passage adapted from the King James Bible that described a woman's brutal murder and her husband's revenge on her attackers. Half the participants were told that the passage came from the Old Testament, the other half that it came from an ancient scroll found by archeologists. One version included a sentence in which God commanded his followers to take arms against others.
According to the news release, researchers found that both religious and secular students who were told that the passage they read came from the Bible were more aggressive to their study partners. This aggression increased when the participants read that God had directly sanctioned violence. In fact, researchers noticed a higher level of aggression among believers than among secularists.
"Even among our participants who were not religiously devout, exposure to God-sanctioned violence increased subsequent aggression," said University of Michigan professor Brad Bushman, lead author of the study published in the March 2007 issue of Psychological Science. "That the effect was found in such a sample may attest to the insidious power of exposure to literary scriptural violence."
What's more dangerous is the fact that most of us don't understand the implications of what we believe. Let's take the Adam and Eve story, for example. These prehistoric beings were born as adults, did not have the benefit of maturing through childhood, and were kicked out of the only home they knew because they acted like disobedient children. At minimum, this story says that God is not forgiving and possibly excessively punitive. Is that what we believe about God--or is that what we believe because it's in the Bible?
How about the Flood story: Do we believe that God is vengeful and genocidal, or do we believe it because it's in the Bible? Do we believe that God is sadistic (Revelations), homophobic (Leviticus), racist (Ham, et. al.), filicidal (crucifixion story) and misogynistic (too many stories to count) and promotes violence--or do we believe it because it's in the Bible? We have a choice and what we choose to believe reflects in our behavior.
Bottom line: If we believe that God can be inhumane, which is the portrayal in many of these stories, we can't expect humans to act more benevolently--and we certainly can't expect the headlines to improve any time soon, either.
Havelock dramatically revealed this. He discovered, as he approached the stadium, that his core belief was that killing innocents is diabolical, so instead, he turned himself in.
To God be the glory!
Patricia Arnold is a veteran broadcast journalist and author and Spirituality Editor of The Daily Voice.
-
NEWS UPDATES
Warning: array_multisort() [function.array-multisort]: Argument #1 is expected to be an array or a sort flag in /home/content/t/h/e/thedailyvoice/html/voice/comments.php on line 6
-
Spirit commented on What's gotten into Donnie McClurkin?:
All I want to know is why everybody worry about what he is doing. You don't have a heaven or hell t...
-
gene willis commented on Angry white man snatches 'Rosa Parks' sign from black woman at town hall meeting:
watching what transpired didnt make any sense.did this woman raise the poster even after she was a...
-
Capow commented on Sarah Kruzan: 16-Year-Old sentenced to life for killing pimp:
I just don't understand the system. This young lady was fighting for her life. The system are col...
-
KHADIJAH commented on Sarah Kruzan: 16-Year-Old sentenced to life for killing pimp:
I FEEL LIKE HE ABUSE HER CHILD HOOD TOOK SOMETHING FROM THAT GIRL AND I KNOW THAT MEN TAKE ADVAN...
-
KHADIJAH commented on Sarah Kruzan: 16-Year-Old sentenced to life for killing pimp:
I FEEL LIKE HE ABUSE HER CHILD HOOD TOOK SOMETHING FROM THAT GIRL AND I KNOW THAT MEN TAKE ADVAN...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright



MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2008-02-09 23:12:13
2008-02-10 19:42:11
2008-02-10 23:09:02
2008-02-11 01:32:00
There are many passages in the Bible that, if taken literally, could be interpreted to mean that God has commanded His people to kill others. For example, there are many passages in which the Hebrews engaged in genocide, presumably at God's command. But consider this: The OT contains the history of the Hebrew people; it was written by them. People generally write their history to make themselves look good and justify their actions. So, it should come as no surprise that the Hebrews wrote part of the OT to rationalize their genocidal behavior.
I don't doubt that many of the writers of the Bible were divinely inspired. However, I very much doubt that all of them were. There was nothing to prevent influential writers from having their books included in the Bible. It wasn't 'till the 4th century that there was agreement on which books should be included in the Bible and there is no reason to suppose that the decisions about which books to include were perfect.
Historically speaking, it is comparatively recent that it has been widely believed that the Bible, as orginally written, is the infallable and inerrant word of God.
I'm quite certain that most of the people here are well aware that the Bible was used to justify slavery of the most inhumane sort. People are more than capable of using the Bible to justify almost anything.
2008-02-13 00:27:53
2008-08-11 15:46:17
2009-02-21 16:05:43
2009-03-16 16:54:35
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com