Saturday, July 4, 2009 12:16am EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
The housing crisis, as seen by blacks and whites
Algernon Austin | Posted March 31, 2008 11:07 AMHow the country responds or does not respond to the housing crisis could add to the long list of racial grievances. As Senator Barack Obama so effectively argued, race can play a big part in our perception of the world. My sense is that, to a degree, whites and blacks have very different readings of what happened to produce the housing crisis.
Of course, there is a diversity of views among whites and blacks, but in talking with people and reading articles, op-eds and reports, I've noticed certain tendencies. My evidence is anecdotal, so I could be wrong, but I would wager that in this issue, as in so many others, race matters.
The whites I've encountered have tended to be more sympathetic to the tough-love approach espoused by Senator John McCain. They have talked about people who irresponsibly sought to purchase more house than they could afford. Or people who thought their home values would rise forever and used their homes like a machine that printed money. In these narratives, people who are facing foreclosure do not deserve much sympathy. They made their bed and they should lie in it.
The blacks that I've heard from bring a very different perspective to the issue. They think of the history of racial discrimination by the Federal Housing Authority. They also think of the recent findings of racial discrimination in lending from paired-tester studies. When these blacks hear of the disproportionate negative impact of the subprime crisis on people of color, their first suspicion is that once again racial discrimination was at play.
Were borrowers facing foreclosure greedy and irresponsible, or were they exploited by racially-biased predatory lenders looking to bundle and sell loans?
It is very difficult to determine to what extent either of these positions is true. But it is very important that we do find out. If we were to bail out large numbers of greedy and irresponsible borrowers, that would be a bad. On the other hand, if we were to ignore the plight of large numbers of blacks who were taken advantage of by lenders, that would also be bad.
It is good to be aware that people have different perspectives on issues. These perspectives should be heard and understood. But, as difficult a time as the country has had in just acknowledging different perspectives, that acknowledgement is still the easy part of the problem.
The hard part is determining which perspective is right and getting everyone, or at least a majority of both sides, to agree on what is the right answer. Only when there is agreement on the right answer can a policy response be crafted that is seen as fair and appropriate by all and racial conflict avoided.
In the housing meltdown, it is quite possible that both positions are correct. It is possible that some people greedily pursued houses they could not afford. It is also possible that minority borrowers were exploited by lenders.
If we are going to bail out institutions involved in the crisis, the federal government should require that we learn exactly what went wrong. If lenders open their records to researchers at the Federal Reserve or the General Accounting Office, we can learn more about the people who borrowed and the homes they acquired. Were the homes extravagant or were the interest terms exorbitant and the deals shady?
It is clear that blacks were more likely to have subprime mortgages, but as lenders are quick to point out, this fact does not prove discrimination. Blacks tend to have more debt, lower incomes and much less wealth than whites, so it could be that blacks' generally worse credit scores placed them disproportionately in the subprime market. If the federal government commissioned a study with individual credit score data--used confidentially, of course--we could obtain very strong evidence on whether it was race or credit scores that placed so many blacks in the subprime market.
Armed with the findings of this research and with sensitivities to the long history of racial discrimination by financial institutions, the country could then move toward a sensible path to prevent us from ending up in this place again.
Recognizing that blacks and whites may come at issues like the housing crisis from different perspectives is an important insight. These perspectives need to be acknowledged and respected. But we can't end there. We need to figure out how we can get blacks and whites--and everybody else--to agree on a common vision of how we should move forward. That is the hard part.
Algernon Austin is director of the program on race, ethnicity and the economy at the Economic Policy Institute.
- MICHAEL JACKSON (1958-2009) (49 comments)
- Black Connecticut church focus of gay teen "exorcism" video (30 comments)
- Should Revs. Sharpton and Jackson be involved in the Michael Jackson story? (27 comments)
- Rev. Al Sharpton praises Michael Jackson as 'historic figure' (24 comments)
- First Lady called "ghetto girl" by Martha Vineyard's black elite (19 comments)
-
Jon Moss commented on Al Sharpton defends role in Michael Jackson case:
Reverend Sharpton, I am just really confused and sad and thought I would send you an email. I ...
-
Anonymous commented on Al Sharpton defends role in Michael Jackson case:
Sharpton is a national Black embarrassment. Michael Jackson was a major drug addict (in addittion ...
-
Ostend Street commented on Al Sharpton defends role in Michael Jackson case:
A big thanks for keeping on doing what you do Rev. Sharpton. I sure your assistance is much appreci...
-
David C. Miller commented on Al Sharpton defends role in Michael Jackson case:
Mr. Sharpton is doing an excellent job providing us with the truth on Michael's death. The Jackson ...
-
B African commented on First Lady called "ghetto girl" by Martha Vineyard's black elite:
I dont feel sorry for Michelle Obama because she treat black people the same way in Chicago who are...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright




MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2008-03-31 14:49:41
2008-04-01 01:12:11
I'm not sure that race directly had anything to do with the problem. It seems to me (as I have posted elsewhere) that the basic problem is that financially naive people were unfairly induced to buy homes that were beyond their means to buy. Many people are not financially astute and depend on good professional advice when making financial decisions; they did not get good advice.
Loan officers and real estate agents have a responsibility to determine whether a person can afford a home that is being purchased with a mortgage. It looks as though loan officers and real estate agents were so hungry for money that they neglected to carry out that responsibility. Now they seem to be getting off Scott-free at the expense of people who are loosing their homes. Moreover, the entire economy of the U.S. is being affected. In addition, because foreign investors have invested in U.S. mortgages, the economies of other countries are being affected as well.
Some people will blame the home buyers. I'm not saying that home buyers have NO responsibility, but these transactions are so complicated that inexperienced people cannot be expected to understand them adequately without good advice, and they did not receive that good advice.
For historical reasons, black people may be more likely to be financially naive than white people, a problem which I hope will eventually cease to exist. That would explain why blacks would be more likely than whites to be loosing their homes. Part of the answer lies in regualtions to protect people from entering into financial transactions that are beyond their means. Also, our high schools should do a better job of teaching money management skills.
I hope that suitable corrective action will be taken to prevent this from happening again. It may be that those who are loosing their homes should be assisted in some manner since I think that many of them were taken advantage of, but I don't have all the answers.
2008-04-01 10:03:30
2008-04-01 11:05:08
2008-04-01 12:23:12
2008-04-01 15:08:27
2008-04-01 16:05:05
2008-04-01 16:39:40
2008-04-03 17:31:31
2008-05-11 15:29:59
2008-07-05 17:35:17
2008-09-30 00:36:17
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com