Clinton says Obama can't win

Let's look at the facts: Obama is a ruthless social climber who likes to parody great men in history like Lincoln and Kennedy. He has next to no record, yet he feels comfortable putting himself in their category. He is using the "fake it before you make it" strategy.

Let's look at the facts: Obama is a ruthless social climber who likes to parody great men in history like Lincoln and Kennedy. He has next to no record, yet he feels comfortable putting himself in their category. He is using the "fake it before you make it" strategy.

I guess they have not seen that one poll that see's the sainted HRC in a positive light at only 37%. What is wrong with her that she and her camp can't figure it out, she has about as much a chance of winning as Bush does in getting a third term. She is not at all likable to the vast majority of voters, and, with her loud, uncouth husband playing the race card, she won't even get the black vote which has been one the DNC can count on. Anybody is better to at least have a chance than HRC to win, and, her sense of entitlement for the job based on whatever she claims is her experience, and, she will be trounced by McCain once all that dirty linen is rehashed, Whitewater, Vince Foster, Monica, the list will go on and on and on.

If Obama can not win, how come he is defeating her? I personally think that the greatest obstacle for Obama was Hillary, and he is over that already. Mccian is going to be easier to beat. He is behind unpopular war, unpopular economic strategy, and Republican party is falling apart - it seems. At the same time Obama is the first candidate in the past couple of decades that inspires hope for the better future and is capable of leading us there.

Clintons negatives are to high and for good reason and are going even lower. She knows it.she is trying to put her spin on it.She says Obama can't win, she thinks know one will look at she has all ready lost.I am looking forward to new blood and Ideas. we don't need another 28 years of Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton!

There's a Chinese proverb that we should know the truth from facts: the bottom line here is that Hillary Clinton is factually the best qualified candidate by virtue of her well- documented, original and enlightened approach to a myriad of vitally important issues as US Senator from NY. I've studied her positions on international, domestic, economic and social issues which, incidentally, are available for anyone to peruse on the Internet. As far as I'm concerned, the record speaks for itself. I know his wont convince anyone ideologically predisposed differently to her positions. And I write not to prove or disprove what the other candidate says, but write what I do know. NY State voters elected and reelected her and not without cause: Just as few short months ago she stood as the justifiably odds on choice as nominee. What cause would there be for voters withhold their support now? Believe me; I for sure have neither the wit, nor words, to forcefully convince anyone of my choice for President: I only tell you that which I and, hopefully, you yourselves do know. If we, all of us, have not lost our reason please, for the good of the nation, support her!

Clinton is only stating the obvious. Obama cannot even seal the deal and wrap up the nomination. There is only a 1% difference in delegates and votes between Clinton and Obama, so maybe she is not as unlikeable as people tend to think. Hillary in '08.

It's interesting how Clinton and company say, he can't win, when he is beating her rather badly. The math doesn't lie. She cannot win. It's more than 1% and she would need a miracle to catch him. She has a less than 10% chance of getting the nomination. She is brainwashing folks, just like she dodged sniper fire. Ultimate Delegate Summary Click Here To See The Rest of the Blog DCW Ultimate Delegate Summary Description Eligible to Vote Delegates Left Pledged Delegates 3253 566 Superdelegates (1) 793 331 Delegates Yet to be allocated -- 5 Total 4046 902 Needed to Win Nomination 2023.5 -- Candidate Delegate Summary Description Obama Clinton Pledged Delegates (AP) 1,414.0 1,250.0 Superdelegates (DCW) 216.0 246.0 Total Delegates 1630.0 1496.0 Delegates Lead 134.0 -- Percentage of Required Delegates 81% 74% Delegates Needed to Win Nomination 393.5 527.5 Additional Candidate Information Popular Vote (GP) 13,376,375 12,634,857 Popular Vote Lead 732,518 -- Pledged Delegates (AP) 1,414.0 1,250.0 Pledged Delegates Lead 164.0 -- Pledged Delegates Left (2) 571.0 571.0 Pledged Delegates Needed for 50% + 1 213.0 377.0 Last Updated: 04/02/2008 5:00 PM

Obama can't win is right. Hillary is entitled to be the candidate based on: 1) the silver spoon in her mouth she was born with 2) shutting up and standing by her man when he humiliated her to no end screwing every bimbo he can find, even in the Oval Office. All strong women tolerate and accept their husbands screwing bimbos, repeatedly, even at their personal shame and humiliation. How dare a Black man go to Harvard, how dare he ignite a movement in America. This election is rightfully Hillary's to have. Obama needs to know his place. Hillary in '08!

Anonymous writes: "How dare a Black man go to Harvard? Obama needs to KNOW HIS PLACE." Are you INSANE? Haven't you heard that slavery ended over 100 years ago? What you write is no different in character from someone who would say "How dare Hillary get out of the kitchen where women belong?" Oh--you believe it's OK for a woman to leave "her traditional place" but not a black. I've read a lot of idiotic nonsense over the internet about both candidates, but this is THE WORST. This is KKK stuff--OMG. Even Hillary Clinton wouldn't say or think stuff like this--she and Bill would be ashamed of you. Bill has been a champion of blacks in America in the past. They would be cringing if they could hear you. I bet you don't like Rev. Wright--well, you sound just like him in reverse. The US is a country full of people from all over the world--for hundreds of years, we've taken immigrants, and our country and constitution honor that. You are, besides being a bigot, a total disgrace to all of us who honor diversity. Signed, Nancy in MA (not afraid to sign my name), a 61 year old WHITE WOMAN with a college education Anonymous, I dare you to identify where you are living (the deep south?)

Clintons are right because they something else in their mind. All of the high ranking Democratic Party leaders are screaming for party unity and directly or indirectly asking Hillary to drop out of the race. But my question is which race everybody is talking about. At this stage Hillary is not fighting to get nominated for the 2008 race. She knows very well that she already lost it. She has no chance to win the nomination. Then the question may arise why she is still running than? She is saying that she will stay till the day of the convention. So does Bill too. The reason why she is saying that because she is preparing the ground for 2012 race. Here is my argument: Hillary will continue her negative campaigning against Obama till the day of convention. She and bill will leave no stone unturned to make Obama bad in the eye of American people. She and her surrogate will damage Obama to that point that he lost in the general election against McCain. That’s her main goal right now. Now McCain is 71 years old and if elected he will be in White House for one term and he is not going to run for another term and for sure he will follow the path of bush in all policies. He might do some cosmetic change but he will never do any U-tern from bush policies. Now after consecutive 3rd term of Republican Presidency, American undoubtly will not choose any republican nominee and there she comes in. and it will be like a piece of cake for her. For Obama this election is his only hope. If he loose in the November election, he will never come back in 2012. But for Hillary Clinton, after this primary, she will go for NY governor ship election and every indication is that she will win and after 4 years of governor of NY State, she will appear as a formidable democratic candidate for a re run in the 2012 presidential race where Obama will not have a chance to compete. The experience …her most talk about phrase will be the real assets for her then. At the present time she does not want any democratic candidate to have the White House except herself because she knows, if Obama win the White House, he might run a second term in 2012 and it will be more difficult for her to compete against a sitting president. And she will not let that happen. She does not care about the upcoming Supreme Court judge selection. She knows very well that if republican get the White House for next term they will selection there man for judge but she does not care. They were well prepared for 2008 back in 2000.only thing that they did not anticipate that Obama will rise from 2004 convention speech. With all the poll results, they figure out that after Super Tuesday, Obama will not have a chance to stand up forget about running. Keeping in mind that they have spend most of their resources in the super Tuesday primary because they thought he will not have a chance after that and when they saw that result were not as they expected that change their strategy from positive campaigning to more and more negative campaigning. Now, judge yourself where we are standing right now.

She's trying to convince Herself! :) (And btw, I think 'Anonymous' was being facetious. (I hope so) HAHA).

Hillary have menopause

Hilary,you are losing your head as a matter of fact I do not understand why you are giving this kinds of abnoxious comments, You are saying Obama cannot win, Give us a proof woman, Obama i beating you, Be it financially, Delegate wise etc. You cannot win you know why, because you are a Woman and that You are behind in everything,I wonder why you are still in his race. Come on think use your head.

Hillary, Come on. This is getting a little embarassing for Democrats. How much more evidence do you need before you see the country wants a BRAND NEW start. Bush, then Clinton, then Bush, then Clinton again? Is our Presidency no more than a party joint to be passed around by to monarchy seeking families. Will "off limits to the media" Chelsy be next? HRC do you really want your legacy to be the Mike Huckabee of the Democrats. You shouldve read the writing on the wall a long time ago. And decided to be the elder statesman of your party, and gracefully bowed down to the OVERWELMINGLY obvious will of the American people. Or is this vintage Clinton politics,"screw everybody" included the American people if they stand between you and something you want. The American people have loved you and your husband for all you have done for this country. Now love us back by bowing out and supporting Obama so we can kick the republicans out of the white house.

The Clintons are the worst type of racists.

If Obama has less chance winning gen election, then Hillary would be ..... worse.Clintons has lost their credibility, this statement coming as no surprised .

Buying Obama - The Auchi Connection Tracing the trail of Iraqi born billionaire Nadhmi Auchi indicates Rezko's deals may include a money trail leading back to Saddam Hussein oil for food program. A 2004 Pentagon report described Auchi, "who, behind the facade of legitimate business, served as Saddam Hussein's principal international financial manipulator and bag man." Auchi prospered in Saddam’s regime collecting "commissions" on sale of weapons and other goods to Iraq in the 1980s and 1990s. A recent Pentagon report accuses Auchi of "unlawful activities working closely with Iraqi intelligence operatives to ... arrange for significant theft from the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program to smuggle weapons and dual-use technology into Iraq," and to "organize an elaborate scheme to take over and control the post-war cellular phone system in Iraq." At Saddam's insistence a scheme orchestrated by Auchi appropriated billions of dollars from America through America’s Oil for Food program into Auchi’s bank account. These transactions passed through Banque Nationale de (BNP) from its 1995 inception until 2001 through Auchi's General Mediterranean Holdings Company (GMHC) which was the largest private shareholder in Paris. Auchi's General Mediterranean Holdings has connections in Iraq which lead right back to Tony Rezko. Auchi's company helped finance a 250 megawatt power plant in the Kurdish town of Chamchamal, Iraq, teaming up with Rezko and Iraq's former Minister of Electricity, Aiham Alsamarrae. In December, 2006 Alsamarrae was accused of graft and is being charged in a $2 billion Iraqi reconstruction corruption case. Alsamarrae is a Chicago resident with dual US-Iraqi citizenship -an embarrassing connection for the war critic Obama. Alsamarrae is now living in his Chicago mansion. Writing in Human Events, March 3, 2008, John Batchelor reports on an Alsammarae-Obama-Rezko connection: "...in April 2005, one month before Mr. Alsammarae left his post, his Ministry of Electricity signed a contract for $50 million with Companion Security to provide training to Iraqis to guard electrical plants by flying them to Illinois for classes. "Companion Security was headed by a former Chicago policeman with a troubled history, Daniel T. Frawley, in partnership with Mr. Rezko and in association with Daniel Mahru, the lawyer for the original contract and Mr. Rezko's former business partner. In April 2006, Mr. Frawley entered negotiations with Governor Rod Blagojevich's staff to lease a military facility in Illinois to be a training camp. In August 2006, Mr. Frawley started negotiations with Mr. Obama's U.S. Senate staff to complete the contract.... "The timeline of Companion discussions in 2006 is important to note: April 2006 Frawley speaks to governor's office; August 2006 Frawley speaks to senator's office; October 2006 indictment of Rezko revealed; October 2006 Rezko arrested upon return from Syria; October 2006 Alsammarae convicted in Baghdad and makes his first escape attempt; December 2006 Alsammarae escapes from Baghdad. ... "(In 2004) Mr. Auchi traveled by private aircraft to Midway Airport in Chicago and then to a fete at the Four Season Hotel, where he met with his business partner in Chicago real estate, Mr. Rezko, as well as with Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. Also present that night, according to a fresh report by James Bone and Dominic Kennedy of the London Times, was State Senator Barack Obama, who had recently won the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate seat...." The Obama Connection Recently the London Times reported that Auchi had been a business partner of Rezko since 2003 and between April 2005 and 2007 loaned Rezko at least $18 million. On February 1 the London Times reports uncovering, "state documents in Illinois recording that Fintrade Services, a Panamanian company, lent money to (an) Obama fundraiser in May 2005. Fintrade's directors include Ibtisam Auchi, the name of Mr. Auchi's wife." "A company related to Mr. Auchi, who has a conviction for corruption in France, registered the loan to Mr. Obama's bagman Antoin ‘Tony' Rezko on May, 23 2005. Mr. Auchi says the loan, through the Panamanian company Fintrade Services SA, was for $3.5 million. These Funds from Auchi's loan helped finance a complex series of transactions between Rezko and Democratic Presidential candidate Illinois Senator Barack Obama involving the 2005 purchase of Obama's Chicago mansion and Rezko's purchase of an adjoining landlocked parcel. Rezko claims he paid “full market price” and Obama apparently received a “discount” of several hundred thousand dollars for his parcel. Rezko then improved his parcel to benefit Obama. Instead of handing cash to Obama, Rezko handed Obama a preferential price for property. This is the same form of “honest graft” and preferential treatment that sent former Illinois Governor Otto Kerner to jail over 30 years ago, see United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974). The Chicago Sun-Times recently reported that Mr. Rezko, around the same general period he was wheeling with Obama, also provided a preferential price for a property purchase by U. S. Representative Luis Gutierrez. Instead of transferring cash to buy influence, Rezko was engaging in structured property transactions and preferential treatment of public officials to confer significant financial benefits on them, far above the legal limits of any legitimate political contribution permitted by federal law. Rezko was a key early-money fund raiser in Obama's state Senate campaigns. and Rezko's relationship with Barack Obama goes back to at least 1990, when Obama's law firm did work relating to a Rezko housing development. Rezko as a major mob figure is not known for civic-mindedness or desire for good government. At a March 3 news conference in San Antonio, Texas, Chicago-based reporters peppered Obama with some of the questions the national news corps has avoided for over a year. Obama claims he had already answered the questions in the Chicago media. He said: "These requests, I think, could just go on forever. At some point, what we need to try to do is respond to what's pertinent." Dana Milbank of the Washington Post wrote: "Reporters, however, had a different idea of what was pertinent, and the questions about Rezko, NAFTA and other unpleasant subjects continued to come. An aide called out ‘last question,' and Obama made his move for the exit -- only for reporters to shout after him in protest. ‘C'mon, guys,' he pleaded. ‘I just answered, like, eight questions.'"

Hey Nancy, i think anonymous was being facetious. :)

When will EVERYONE realize that "BILLARY" Clinton is a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR! http://OsiSpeaks.com

Clinton: Obama can't win! Obama: WATCH ME! :D

"I've studied her positions on international, domestic, economic and social issues which, incidentally, are available for anyone to peruse on the Internet." As are Obama's by the way, though the Hillary people like to say he is going on charisma alone. "As far as I'm concerned, the record speaks for itself. I know his wont convince anyone ideologically predisposed differently to her positions." For those who are not experienced at listening to drunks try to sound sober on talk radio, this means "If you disagree with her, you probably won't like her positions." Thanks for your call! "NY State voters elected and reelected her and not without cause: Just as few short months ago she stood as the justifiably odds on choice as nominee." When did they re-elect her? She has held one elective office for one term. No wonder you think she's experienced -- you've got no idea what her background is! And, yes, a few short months ago she was the odds on choice -- and then people began to get to know her. Well, not everybody. Some people apparently think she was "re-elected" at some point, and that she's qualified to be president.

Nancy. laugh out loud.

These comment sections are not designed for the type of lengthy dissenting dissertions I am starting to see on this site. It isn't good policy and certainly not good electronic etiquette. Some of these comments are longer then the actual article. Remember these "e" systems are designed to get to the point and move on. As much as I love to read some of the comments, enough is enough.