Saturday, July 4, 2009 9:23pm EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
Should marijuana use be legal?
That's a question that will be debated in public now that Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) has introduced a bill that would remove federal penalties for personal marijuana use.
Speaking at a press conference Wednesday in support of the legislation, HR 5843, Frank said we "should not lock people up" or use federal resources to stop people from using marijuana unless they are harming someone else or engaging in excessive behavior.
The new bill would eliminate federal penalties for possession of up to 100 grams (about 3½ ounces) of marijuana, and for the not-for-profit transfer of up to one ounce of marijuana.
Representatives from the drug reform lobby, including the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) and the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), all support the legislation. But the Bush Administration does not.
Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of NORML calls the legislation "the first time in a generation" that Congress is taking a "serious look" at reforming components of cannabis prohibition laws.
St. Pierre also praised Congressional Black Caucus members who took part in the press conference, Reps. Barbara Lee (D-CA) and William Lacy Clay (D-MO). The two CBC members argued that marijuana laws unfairly target African-Americans for arrest, and Clay blamed "a phony war on drugs" for "filling up our prisons, especially with people of color."
But representatives from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) attended the press conference to rebut the claims that marijuana is safe, even for medical purposes.
Groups Say Marijuana Is Safe
Marijuana is the third most popular recreational drug in America, behind alcohol and tobacco, according to NORML. The group says nearly 80 million Americans have used marijuana and points to government surveys indicating that 20 million Americans have smoked marijuana in the past year.
"Marijuana is far less dangerous than alcohol or tobacco," says NORML. According to statistics on the group's web site, more than 400,000 die each year from tobacco smoking and 50,000 people die each year from alcohol poisoning. But marijuana, on the other hand, is "nontoxic and cannot cause death by overdose."
The federal government does not agree. "Marijuana is the blindspot of drug policy," said John Walters, director of national drug control policy. "Baby Boomers have this perception that marijuana is about fun and freedom. It isn't. It's about dependency, disease, and dysfunction," he said in a press release.
But cannabis users argue that marijuana can also be used to treat illnesses, including glaucoma, asthma, multiple sclerosis and HIV/AIDS. Although 12 states allows medical marijuana use, the federal government does not, putting users in a position of legal limbo.
Rep. Lee said California law allows medical marijuana and criticized federal policy as "inhumane" and "immoral." The new legislation would allow people suffering from chronic pain or illness to smoke marijuana legally.
Talk show host Montel Williams agrees. Williams has spoken out about his own need for medical marijuana to deal with the pain associated with multiple sclerosis. He has said he takes nearly a hundred pills a day to treat his condition, and after serving 22 years in the military, he feels he should not be made to feel like a criminal just because he needs a drug to keep him healthy and out of pain.
Costs of Enforcement
Supporters of the legislation also argue that enforcing marijuana laws costs taxpayers $10 billion a year. A marijuana smoker is arrested every 38 seconds, says St. Pierre.
Rob Kampia, director of the Marijuana Policy Project, said marijuana arrests outnumber arrests for "all violent crimes combined," forcing police to spend more time chasing nonviolent criminals than violent ones.
But the Bush Administration disagrees. Officials from ONDCP issued a preemptive press release on Tuesday to show that "less than one half of one percent of inmates in state prisons are serving time for marijuana possession only."
But Rep. Frank responded to this argument at the press conference, "I never understood why people thought it was a defense of a law staying on the books that it was rarely used," he said.
Public Opinion On Marijuana
Marijuana use was outlawed in 1937 in the U.S., four years after the end of Prohibition. But pressure began to reform the law in the 1970s, according to the Drug Policy Alliance.
The Netherlands passed a law in 1976 that declared cannabis a "soft drug," which was not subject to "prosecution, detection or arrest" in certain amounts. And in 1996, voters in California approved Proposition 215, which allows sick and dying patients to use marijuana for medicinal purposes.
"The vast amount of human activity ought to be none of the government's business," Frank said at the news conference on Wednesday. "I don't think it is the government's business to tell you how to spend your leisure time," he said.
Although most Americans support efforts to reduce penalties or decriminalize personal recreational use of marijuana, they do not support legalizing marijuana altogether. A Gallup poll in 1995 found a third of Americans support legalizing marijuana, up from just 12 percent in 1969, but still not a majority.
Support for medical marijuana, on the other hand, is much higher, even among older Americans. A 2004 poll conducted for the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) found the overwhelming majority of seniors support legalizing marijuana for medical purposes. Sixty nine percent of those 70 and older agreed that adults should be allowed to legally use marijuana for medical purposes if a physician recommends it.
The issue of decriminalizing drug use may be controversial in a presidential election year when candidates are trying not to offend voters. But Rep. Frank's bill is not expected to come to a full committee vote until 2009.
Articles written by a Staff Reporter are unsigned reports from a member of the staff.
- MICHAEL JACKSON (1958-2009) (49 comments)
- Black Connecticut church focus of gay teen "exorcism" video (31 comments)
- Should Revs. Sharpton and Jackson be involved in the Michael Jackson story? (27 comments)
- Rev. Al Sharpton praises Michael Jackson as 'historic figure' (24 comments)
- First Lady called "ghetto girl" by Martha Vineyard's black elite (23 comments)
-
Roger commented on I can never be Venus or Serena Williams:
And lets not forget, they have had the worst crowds in the good old USA cheer against them, and, th...
-
Roger commented on I can never be Venus or Serena Williams:
And Jane, you people never stop the racist hate, too bad you are broke and in that mobile home voti...
-
Roger commented on Sarah Palin resigning as governor:
Good riddance, but sadly this is just the start of her hate for America tour in the lower 48 and ke...
-
Carmen commented on Al Sharpton defends role in Michael Jackson case:
Rock on Rev Al and keep on doing your thing, you are loved by millions! And, Rev Al is a better spo...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright




MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2008-07-31 02:16:55
2008-07-31 03:15:06
2008-07-31 03:22:19
2008-07-31 04:41:36
2008-07-31 05:55:18
2008-07-31 08:10:39
2008-07-31 09:04:36
2008-07-31 09:51:43
2008-07-31 11:07:27
2008-07-31 11:27:09
2008-07-31 11:34:02
2008-07-31 12:07:07
2008-07-31 12:27:53
Its not a "Gateway" Drug: There have been more than enough studies (one of the most important ones was conducted by UC Berkley), which shows that marijuna is not a "gateway" drug...people who are inclined to drug abuse will abuse hard drugs rather they try weed first or not.
What exactly is a Pot Head?: It always amazes me when people say that weed is for criminals, druggies, or unmotivated people...I live in a VERY affluent neighborhood of highly successful professionals, and you can't go down the street without smelling marijuna coming out people's windows. These aren't so-called "pot heads" these are productive, law abiding citizens who enjoy alittle herb.....And I am a successful business person, and I smoke weed...all of my friends (mostly doctors, lawyers, and other professionals) smoke weed also....none of us use any harder drugs. Most people tend to use it as a way to relax (similar to a cocktail).
We can't make generalized judgements about something based on old-school opinions.
2008-07-31 12:51:55
2008-07-31 12:52:42
Step 1 (License Distributors): The state/federal government will license distributors (stores, pharmacists, or private businesses) to sell it.
Step 2 (Collecting Taxes): The Fed/state government empowers the distributors assess a sales tax at the point of sale. And they send in the taxes the have assessed on a quarterly basis...
Therefore, Alex, taxation working isn't reliant on the "trpical pot heads" remembering to pay taxes...
2008-07-31 13:18:58
2008-07-31 15:23:38
2008-07-31 15:38:57
2008-07-31 15:40:05
2008-07-31 16:13:28
To EVERYONE ELSE: be encouraged, marijuna is damn-near legal in california, and 11 other states already allow it to be distributed under regulation...in Ney York, you can have over an ounce of weed on you without any prosecution!
...legalizations OBVIOUSLY near!
2008-07-31 16:32:46
2008-07-31 16:32:55
2008-07-31 16:37:55
2008-07-31 16:57:54
Americans,
You must continue your "war on drugs." Hashish is our primary source of funding in 2008. Without drug laws in the United States creating a gross imbalance between Afghanistan's hashish market and that of the United States, the Taliban will not be able to afford new rocket propelled grenades and AK-47s for our holy war. Our organization cannot thrive without being gifted hundreds of millions of dollars for plants that cost mere pennies to grow.
Sincerely yours,
Taliban
2008-07-31 17:03:00
2008-07-31 17:28:29
Secondly, I called Alex's position "ignorant" based on him saying that marijuna is a "starter drug" and because of the ridiculous generalizations he put forth about all users of marijuna, i.e. "thugs," "unemployed," etc.
as for your comment about "side affects" of marijuna guiding my comments on this forum....You don't know me, or anything about me. SO either make a valid point about the issue at hand, or direct your unsolicited comments elsewhere :-)
2008-07-31 17:31:17
2008-07-31 17:34:09
2008-07-31 18:17:57
2008-07-31 18:42:36
2008-07-31 18:49:35
2008-07-31 21:44:12
" between the paragraphs...remove the "" though
2008-07-31 21:45:16
2008-08-01 04:20:06
2008-08-01 09:41:55
Now you can go to church if you want to go high but fact is everyone needs to get high sometime.
Being high all the time however is irresponsible. But it should not be illegal, if for instance being drunk all the time is not illegal, or being obesse is not illegal. Any substance, including food, can be abused. Anyway im convinced this a debate question for people who can't do arithmatics.2008-08-01 10:59:42
2008-08-01 14:59:55
2008-08-02 11:45:37
2008-08-02 11:53:20
2008-08-02 12:36:39
2008-08-02 14:21:24
In what vision of a free country do we imprison responsible citizens because they enjoy the flower of a plant or the extract of a grape? We tried banning the grape years ago and what happened? Mass incarceration, criminalization of ordinary citizens, organized crime, violent battles for control of a lucrative black market, violation of individual rights and and loss of respect for law enforcement. Does any of that sound familiar?
Does Santayana ring true, Alex? Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
2008-08-02 18:32:31
2008-08-03 15:16:30
Your ignorant responces really motivated the commenters to post some excellent points that support legalization of MJ. While they were arguing with you I was being educated me about all of this...
Its sad that you weren't able to benefit from the knowledge being communicated.... but not all was lost; some of us are walking away a bit more educated about this!
They may not have changed your mind (nor did I expect them to), but I am SOLD...LEGALIZE IT!
2008-08-03 20:34:07
2008-08-04 20:21:21
2008-08-05 01:05:50
2008-08-11 18:57:46
2008-08-11 23:26:12
2008-08-15 20:41:07
2008-08-24 20:50:26
2008-08-26 23:53:38
2008-09-01 16:45:13
2008-09-04 23:56:54
2008-09-08 06:51:04
2008-09-24 17:50:11
2008-11-03 10:35:08
2008-12-12 12:55:17
2008-12-13 18:13:52
2008-12-16 11:29:55
2008-12-17 13:38:03
2008-12-19 06:30:23
2009-01-13 08:15:51
2009-03-05 09:53:21
2009-03-16 18:21:21
2009-03-16 20:44:33
2009-03-20 21:46:38
2009-03-25 21:24:54
2009-04-01 14:58:15
2009-04-01 15:02:51
2009-04-01 15:11:23
2009-04-01 15:16:36
2009-05-07 01:44:06
2009-05-07 18:03:28
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com