Monday, March 22, 2010 8:59am EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
Barack Obama's audacity of hope
Keith Boykin | Posted February 27, 2009 9:19 AM
Change has come to Washington. In little over a month's time, Barack Obama is reshaping the conversation about the federal government and reversing old Bush administration policies despised by progressives. With early victories already under the belt and control of both houses of Congress in their hands, Democrats have begun to believe it is possible to do what was once unthinkable in the post-Reagan era seemingly obsessed with smaller government and lower taxes.
Obama's new budget would raise taxes on the wealthy, cut loopholes for high-income earners, and return to Clinton era tax rates that prevailed during the 1990s. All of which would help fund a broad new shift toward a more activist government. And that's to say nothing of the possibility of "nationalizing" some big American banks, something the administration still won't say it completely rejects.
If those goals seem challenging, the Democrats have new hope from the experience of recent weeks. The new president has already signed a $787 billion stimulus bill, reversed Bush administration restrictions on abortion, announced plans to close the U.S. detention camp at Guantanamo and declared an end to torture.
In his first major act of legislation, he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, reversing a controversial Supreme Court decision that made it harder for for women to receive equal pay for equal work with men. And shortly afterwards, Obama reversed Bush administration policy on another issue when he signed a law that extended health insurance protection to children.
The Audacity of Hope
Four years ago, when George Bush was beginning his second term in office and Democrats were demoralized about the future, few could have imagined that America would elect a young black Democrat to follow Bush. Fewer still would have imagined that the new president would so quickly repudiate the economic and foreign policy of his predecessor and set the nation on an ambitious new path.
But it was all there in writing for Americans to see if they wanted. In Obama's second book, The Audacity of Hope, he warned that "if we don't change course soon, we may be the first generation in a very long time that leaves behind a weaker and more fractured America than the one we inherited."
And although he acknowledged to Americans in the book that "government couldn't solve all their problems," he did declare his belief that a "slight change in priorities" could allow the nation to meet the challenges we face.
The "slight change" he proposed was spelled out in detail in his book, cleverly presented in politically neutral tones about bipartisanship, but it was always a progressive agenda.
Obama argued in his book that Americans were "waiting for a politics with the maturity to balance idealism and realism, to distinguish between what can and what cannot be compromised, to admit the possibility that the other side might sometimes have a point."
It was, in hindsight, classic Obama, calling for both sides to work together at the same time he set out a bold new vision to transform the role of government. it was the same sort of perspective he brought to the fight over the stimulus plan, reaching out his hand to include Republicans even as they turned their backs on his proposal.
In the end, Obama's efforts to extend an olive branch to the GOP may endear him to Americans who want their president to believe in a strong vision for the country but don't want him to vilify his adversaries. And by rejecting Obama's appeal to bipartisanship, Republicans may have made it easier for Obama to reject their critiques in the future as they have already begun to be defined by their resistance.
History will record whether Obama's ambitious agenda and strategy will pay off, but no doubt it represents his own audacity of hope. Not since Lyndon Johnson or Franklin Roosevelt has America seen a president lay out such an expansive image of reform. And few have done it while maintaining the image of bipartisanship. Maybe that is Obama's great genius, after all.
"Maybe the critics are right," Obama wrote in The Audacity of Hope. "Maybe there's no escaping our great political divide, an endless clash of armies, and any attempts to alter the rules of engagement are futile. Or maybe the trivialization of politics has reached a point of no return, so that most people see it as just one more diversion, a sport, with politicians our paunch-bellied gladiators and those who bother to pay attention just fans on the sidelines: We paint our faces red or blue and cheer our side and boo their side, and if it takes a late hit or cheap shot to beat the other team, so be it, for winning is all that matters. But I don't think so."
Keith Boykin is editor of The Daily Voice, a CNBC contributor and a BET political commentator.
- Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's wife launches Tea Party group (75 comments)
- 'All black people' told to leave NJ Wal-Mart (64 comments)
- Is this as good as it gets for Mo'Nique and Gabourey? (38 comments)
- Artist defends 42nd Street mural under fire (23 comments)
- Texas Board of Education writes Hip-Hop out of history books (19 comments)
-
LL is a liar commented on Democrats celebrate historic victory for health care reform:
First of all LL.....Folks can stil purchase drugs from Candaa. Please go take your as.s. opver to F...
-
Cecil Jones commented on Democrats celebrate historic victory for health care reform:
I think it's great that Democrats did something unfortunately they did something that could cost us...
-
Knowledge commented on Democrats celebrate historic victory for health care reform:
Perfect, no; not by a long shot. Required; yes, as the gateway to better coverage (e.g., single pay...
-
LL commented on Democrats celebrate historic victory for health care reform:
Don't forget the prescription drug benefit of 2003 or SCHIP in 1997....
-
gnat commented on Democrats celebrate historic victory for health care reform:
This significance of this vote to those who write history books simply cannot be overstated. 1933. ...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright



MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2009-02-28 11:04:59
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com