Thursday, September 2, 2010 12:29pm EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
Americans love their guns.
So much so, the right to bear arms is one of the most sacrosanct of American freedoms, preserved in that most cherished of American documents, the Constitution.
Aaaah, freedom.
We are free to buy and sell guns to our heart's content, with few restrictions. We are basically free to shoot anybody and anything we deem shoot-able.
Of course, violent offenders risk imprisonment, if they don't shoot themselves first. And increasingly, shooters are shooting themselves--after first killing any number of innocent victims, of course. Murder-suicide is all the rage.
One can simply walk into any number of venues--be they public or private--and just aim and shoot. Some choose their homes, while others have a preference for post offices, immigration centers or shopping malls.
Plus, now that President Obama has signed into law a provision to carry concealed weapons in national parks and wildlife preserves, can these peaceful refuges be far behind?
And let us not forget about churches and museums.
Yesterday, an 88 year-old man, a white supremacist, opened fire inside the Holocaust Memorial Museum in the nation's capital, killing an African American security guard. (I'm guessing this was on his "bucket list," no?) And last weekend, the abortion provider, Dr. George Tiller was slain while he worshipped in a Kansas church.
This has long been a problem in America, but it seems to be happening more and more.
And more and more, the shooters are very young, as are the victims. Perhaps this is one of the most devastating legacies of Columbine. And Virginia Tech.
Looking back to those tragic mass shootings--and to the innumerable shootings that occur with alarming frequency around this nation, particularly in the Black community--one has to wonder what it says about American culture.
It also raises a number of difficult questions, among them these: How did we become so violent? Why are our children so prone to violence?
When looking for the culprit, many point to the media and to the prevalence of violent fare on television and in films. Or perhaps, it is the pervasive violence in video games.
Whatever the case, one need only look to the numbers to know that we have a full-blown national crisis on our hands. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence reports that, on average, 23 African Americans die from gunshots every day.
Every day.
Tragically, according to the Brady Campaign, after car crashes, the second leading cause of death among young people under 19 is firearms. Further, children under 14 years old are 12 times more likely to die from a gunshot "than in 25 other industrialized countries combined."
Just this week a 9-year-old Mississippi boy was killed during a struggle with his 11-year-old brother when a 12-gauge shotgun reportedly went off accidently during a struggle. The Associated Press reports that the younger brother retrieved his father's gun from the closet after his big brother beat him at a few video games.
And this past weekend a 13-year-old girl was gunned down in a drive-by shooting at a block party for a local city council candidate in New Jersey. According to BET.com, police Captain Joe Juniak told the Times of Trenton that "it was automatic gunfire, definitely automatic gunfire."
Not to mention the rash of shootings ravaging Chicago in recent months. In one 24-hour period last month, 7 people were killed. A few weekends prior there were 36 separate incidents, leaving 9 people dead. And Chicago is only the latest urban graveyard.
So, whose fault is it?
This is another question that no one really wants to confront. That is, are the guns the problem, or is it the shooters who bear the blame? I mean, is this a matter of failed parenting? Or perhaps this is a clear case of those proverbial chickens coming home to roost, in a nation born of violence...and hate, yes?
More importantly, what do we do about it?
Concrete action is needed. Our lawmakers, encouraged by President Obama, must begin the difficult task of trying to un-ring the proverbial gun bell. We must insist on gun control laws that close the gun show loopholes, and that limit the availability of automatic and semi-automatic weapons on our streets.
Further, parents must do all that is humanly possible to limit the exposure of our children to violence-for-the-sake-of-entertainment. Speaking of which, we must find a way to make the entertainment industry accountable for its violent productions.
Ultimately, of course, it is a matter of shared responsibility. People who shoot other people make a conscious decision to do so, but what brings them to that point? This is, as they say, the heart of the matter.
Of course, just the very mention of gun control will elicit a pitched battle in some circles, but it is a fight well worth fighting. We can no longer allow the National Rifle Association and its lobby to drive gun legislation. We must do this for our children. Otherwise, we will continue to pay the horrific cost of this peculiarly American freedom.
Oh, but were freedom free...
Dr. Pamela D. Reed is a diversity consultant, cultural critic, and assistant professor of English and African-American literature at Virginia State University.
-
NEWS UPDATES
Warning: array_multisort() [function.array-multisort]: Argument #1 is expected to be an array or a sort flag in /home/content/t/h/e/thedailyvoice/html/voice/comments.php on line 6
-
Spirit commented on What's gotten into Donnie McClurkin?:
All I want to know is why everybody worry about what he is doing. You don't have a heaven or hell t...
-
gene willis commented on Angry white man snatches 'Rosa Parks' sign from black woman at town hall meeting:
watching what transpired didnt make any sense.did this woman raise the poster even after she was a...
-
Capow commented on Sarah Kruzan: 16-Year-Old sentenced to life for killing pimp:
I just don't understand the system. This young lady was fighting for her life. The system are col...
-
KHADIJAH commented on Sarah Kruzan: 16-Year-Old sentenced to life for killing pimp:
I FEEL LIKE HE ABUSE HER CHILD HOOD TOOK SOMETHING FROM THAT GIRL AND I KNOW THAT MEN TAKE ADVAN...
-
KHADIJAH commented on Sarah Kruzan: 16-Year-Old sentenced to life for killing pimp:
I FEEL LIKE HE ABUSE HER CHILD HOOD TOOK SOMETHING FROM THAT GIRL AND I KNOW THAT MEN TAKE ADVAN...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright



MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2009-06-11 05:17:36
2009-06-11 05:17:36
2009-06-11 10:32:45
2009-06-11 11:43:00
2009-06-11 11:55:58
2009-06-11 11:58:01
2009-06-11 12:34:39
2009-06-11 16:22:59
2009-06-11 16:42:19
2009-06-11 17:45:53
2009-06-11 18:13:52
2009-06-11 18:17:13
2009-06-11 22:06:01
2009-06-12 13:43:07
2009-06-12 13:51:06
2009-06-12 16:40:33
2009-06-12 16:42:02
2009-06-12 20:07:43
2009-06-12 20:45:46
2009-06-12 21:32:45
2009-06-13 11:24:43
2009-06-14 10:18:56
2009-06-14 10:32:14
2009-06-14 11:25:22
2009-06-15 04:08:22
2009-06-15 09:00:42
2009-06-16 09:08:41
2009-06-16 14:00:15
2009-06-17 09:59:46
2009-06-17 14:03:53
2009-06-17 17:46:02
2009-06-18 04:30:10
2009-06-18 10:29:15
2009-06-21 16:20:26
2009-06-23 16:10:47
Rights – including the right to bear arms – exist in the face of opposition. In fact, rights aren't needed when there is no opposition. An individual taking a breath doesn't need an enumerated "right to inhale" in order to do so with impunity. The very fact that a political faction wants to take away a cherished right – any one that's have been listed – proves the need for that right's existence.
Some people don't like others having the right to speak out – the First Amendment – on issues that they deem important. Other people believe that their religious values should dominate the lives of everyone (we're also protected from that by the First Amendment.) Yet another group believes that it's fine for the government to monitor private telephone conversations without benefit of a court of law approving that intrusion (Fourth Amendment). We must oppose any of those groups.
Just because some people don't respect our constitution – the entire constitution – doesn't mean that it has become irrevelant or obsolete.... it is all the more relevant. Can you imagine if a David Duke type and his adherents were to gain prominence, and demand the revocation of the Thirteenth Amendment... the abolition of slavery? Surely, someone like that might find others who would agree that the Thirteenth should be expunged. Therefore, it would be right to do so?
Although some of the individuals who espouse elimination of the Second Amendment – the right to bear arms – might not be the same individuals who wish to see slavery reestablished, their mindset is the same.
2009-07-15 08:47:38
2009-07-27 22:32:59
2009-08-05 09:45:04
2009-08-05 10:22:28
2009-08-18 14:13:57
2009-09-16 11:06:46
2009-10-29 15:40:53
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com