A Web site where the Obama family is called 'street ghetto trash'

"To entertain her daughter, Michelle Obama loves to make monkey sounds." Photo caption of Michelle Obama speaking to her daughter Malia posted on The Free Republic.

Disclaimer on The Free Republic: "Free Republic does not advocate or condone racism, violence, rebellion, secession, or an overthrow of the government. "

For those of you who have argued vociferously with me that we are living in a "post-racial America" rather than an America in which Jim Crow is on steroids, you apparently have not read the daily diet of racism that the readers and bloggers on this site consume and then regurgitate. The photo caption above was posted with a blog in which comments included:

"Could you imagine what world leaders must be thinking seeing this kind of street trash and that we paid for this kind of street ghetto trash to go over there?"

"They make me sick .... The whole family... mammy, pappy, the free loadin' mammy-in-law, the misguided chillin', and especially 'lil cuz... This is not the America I want representin' my peeps.

First, it is easy to dismiss these comments as isolated incidents posted on a right-wing vestige. To do so of course would completely miss the point. Moreover, these comments show the continuing significance of race in a country that has become so enamored with the election of its first Black President. In fact, far too many of us are content only with the symbolism and dismiss the substance. I have heard many say that he can't tackle race in his first term but that he will do it in his second.

The result is that too many of us have accepted racism as a creature of the past and we use the election of President Obama as unequivocal proof of this.

The reality is that Bull Conner, the Grand Wizards and members of the KKK and the Aryan Nation have been replaced by the writers, editors and owners of The Free Republic who through the use of technology have more power to spread hate and racism that any of the three aforementioned entities combined. The Free Republic is the modern day racist engine that a majority of Conservatives rely on to indoctrinate an old and new generation of race peddlers and demagogues. Of course, the site owner is also a "sensitive" man.

According to site owner, Jim Robinson, "We should steer clear of Obama's children. They can't help it if their old man is an American-hating Marxist pig."

Second, far too many of us have responded to the election of President Obama simply as the removal of the most significant symbol of racism and manifestation of subordination without realizing that while significant, his election alone does not mean the entrenched racists mindset that continues in so much of America has simply vanished.

Racial thinking will not be cured by a single event no matter how powerful that event. Web sites like The Free Republic provide a gathering place for Whites who are convinced that the election of a Black President means the end of White power and the introduction of Negro rule. For those of you who wish to quibble with me about whether President Obama is Black or multi-racial; I say that the readers of The Free Republic are not confused. Their arguments are not based in multiculturalism, they are based in naked racial stereotypes that have been and continue to be assigned to Blacks.

As one writer on The Free Republic puts it "we can no longer afford to give people the benefit of the doubt simply because we do not know them personally. Our tolerance in this area has the effect of shredding the fabric of our society. It has nothing to do with being hateful, racist, or biased. It is merely a desire to maintain our society and culture."

Third, since the president's election, there has been an emerging cacophony of Blacks who insist that the president should stay "race neutral" because to do otherwise would relegate his presidency to the margins of history. These voices were loudest when the president boycotted the World Racism Conference, did not announce a Black person on the short list for the United States Supreme Court, chided Attorney General Eric Holder for his comments that on the question of race, America is a nation of cowards, said that Judge Sotomayor misspoke with her "wise Latinia" woman comment and punted in Destafano v Ricci. It as if the President cannot be both race-conscious in his policies and govern effectively at the same time. To be sure, since his election racism has not taken a holiday and his attempts at race neutrality have been an abysmal failure.

Fourth, while we have become so caught up in the symbolism of the president's election, many of us have failed to even care that the United States Supreme Court in the Ricci case has turned back the clock, thus making it harder to prove racial discrimination for racial minority employees, making easier for Whites, and making it harder for employers to defend employment decisions when they choose racial minorities over Whites.

I have heard very few people calling for Congress and the president to overturn that case by legislation. Yet, the very first bill that the President signed was the Lilly Ledbetter Act overturning a Supreme Court decision on equal pay. Do we wish to become so race neutral that we refuse to acknowledge the deep social context in which racial subordination is a reality in America Black President or not?

Certainly The Free Republic understands the racial context of President Obama's election. "DIRTBAGS! All of them. Our [White House] is now a joke to the rest of the world. We have no respect and this is not going to turn out well, mark my words. We will be hit, and much worse than last time. We are now seen as weak and vulnerable. Ghetto and Chicago thugs have taken over."

Finally, regardless of whether we wish to admit it or not, the political winds that lifted the civil rights movement have shifted right.

As the posts that I have quoted from and so many others on The Free Republic indicate, the election of President Obama has rewritten the racial narrative. The devotees will insist that the new narrative not trade the rights of Blacks for the safety of Whites nor would it be held hostage to the ghost of slavery.

A post to The Free Republic sums up white racial thinking best: "96% of blacks supported Zero in November. A group of 50 blacks set upon whites for being white in July. Decades of witnessing life. Those are a few reasons it's back to the '50s for this white devil, 1750s that is. As much as I can legally discriminate I will discriminate. To paraphrase Marty Balin: Everything they say we are, I'll be. Wasn't always this way. It is now."

Ahh..the perils of a "post-racial America."