Tuesday, February 9, 2010 8:12am EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
What not to wear at Morehouse
Frank Leon Roberts | Posted October 9, 2009 4:05 AMMoving Beyond Black Male Respectability:
Notes on Morehouse College's Dress Code Policy
Like many graduate students, I suffer from a serious "cant-get-any-work-done-in-my-apartment" syndrome. Try as I may, each time I sit down to write an article or dissertation chapter, I find myself having to venture out of my apartment and into a more open, public setting (libraries or cafes work well for me).
So there was nothing unusual about my decision to pack up my laptop today and head over to Morehouse College's Jazzmen Café to work on my dissertation amidst a comfortable climate of Pumpkin Lattes and innocently-arrogant Kappa Alpha Psi undergraduates. At 6 o'clock, after I had managed to spend three hours working, I decided to grab a bite to eat at Morehouse's Cafeteria. As I paid my $6 Non-Morehouse student fee to enter the cafeteria, I was told that in order to enter I would need to remove my red, fitted-baseball cap. "Uhm...ok" I thought to myself. It seemed a bit strange to me that baseball hats would be prohibited in a stinky, old cafeteria lounge, but hey, then again this was Morehouse College, an institution hell-bent on promoting images of black middle class respectability and propriety.I didn't think anything of the no-red-fitted-caps-in-the-cafeteria policy until I glanced over at a headline from the October 6th Issue of The Maroon Tiger (Morehouse's 84 year old student newspaper). "Administration Announces New Attire Policy."
Immediately, I dropped my spoon in the stale cafeteria macaroni.
The administration's new policy (which goes into effect this month) is spear-headed by Morehouse's new President, Dr. Robert Michael Franklin Jr.
Here is a verbatim copy of the policy. It's almost too-good to be true.
Morehouse College Appropriate Attire Policy
October 2009
Published in The Maroon Tiger
It is our expectation that students who select Morehouse do so because of the College's outstanding legacy of producing leaders. On the campus and at College-sponsored events and activities, students at Morehouse College will be expected to dress neatly and appropriately at all times.
Students who choose not to abide by this policy will be denied admission into class and various functions and services of the College if their manner of attire is inappropriate. Examples of inappropriate attire and/or appearance include but are not limited to:
1. No caps, do-rags and/or hoods in classrooms, the cafeteria, or other indoor venues. This policy item does not apply to headgear considered as a part of religious or cultural dress.
2. Sun glasses or "shades" are not to be work in class or at formal programs, unless medical documentation is provided to support use.
3. Decorative orthodontic appliances (e.g. "grillz") be they permanent or removable, shall not be worn on the campus or at College-sponsored events.
4. Jeans at major programs such as, Opening Convocation, Commencement, Founder's Day or other programs dictating professional, business casual attire, semi-formal or formal attire.
5. Clothing with derogatory, offense and/or lewd messages either in words or pictures.
6. Top and bottom coverings should be work at all times. No bare feet in public venues.
7. No sagging--the wearing of one's pants or shorts low enough to reveal undergarments or secondary layers of clothing.
8. Pajamas, shall not be worn while in public or in common areas of the College.
9. No wearing of clothing associated with women's garb (dresses, tops, tunics, purses, pumps, etc.) on the Morehouse campus or at College-sponsored events.
10. Additional dress regulations may be imposed upon students participating in certain extracurricular activities that are sponsored or organized by the College (e.g. athletic teams, the band, Glee Club, etc).
11. The college reserves the right to modify this policy as deemed appropriate.
*All administrative, faculty, students and support staff members are asked to assist in enforcing this policy and may report disregard or violations to the Office of Student Conduct. "
Wait a second: tell me this doesn't really say no "pumps" or "purses" at college sponsored events? And wait, are they really trying to ban grillz? What's up Morehouse?
I must be missing something. Is there some kind of growing, critical mass of high-heel wearing, gold-tooth rockin' boys threatening to take over the campus? (if so, Big Up).
Morehouse: I love you, but I'm going to need you to rethink this. Instead of prohibiting baggy jeans and non-normative gender attire, perhaps you might want to celebrate the fact that there is such a rich plurality of black styles and expressive self-fashionings found among Morehouse's all-male population. And less we forget, Morehouse is still a liberal arts college, right? Whatever happened to the idea of letting young undergraduate men "find themselves"--even if that means letting them sag their jeans a little bit or even throwing on a little black nail polish every now and then.
As an African American man who has deep sense of admiration for Morehouse's legacy (confession: I was very close to choosing Morehouse over NYU for college), I'm disturbed. This "proper attire" policy not only obviously contains an egregiously heterosexist bias, it also contains a deeply problematic class-politics.
Let's be real, Morehouse Pres: are we afraid that if these Morehouse boys wear baggy jeans, they might look a little too much like the local, poor community of the Castleberry section of Atlanta (where Morehouse is located)?
This is nuts. I was very proud of the college's recent decision to fire an employee who sent out homophobic emails to Morehouse's staff. Lets keep the ball rolling in that direction and not turn our backs on all those Durag-wearing, Timbs and Jeans rockin, Heels and Pumps-prone undergraduates we know you have all over your campus.
How do you feel about the policy? Am I just trippin'?
Frank Leon Roberts is a Ford Foundation Dissertation Fellow in American Studies. He blogs at frankrobertsonline.com.
- Obama to Democrats: 'Turn off the cable news and lead' (16 comments)
- Baptist missionaries or child traffickers? (15 comments)
- Sarah Palin's crocodile tears over the N word (13 comments)
- Gen. Colin Powell now favors repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (9 comments)
- Serena wins Australian Open (6 comments)
-
J.R. Freeman commented on Sarah Palin's cheat sheet:
It's so sad that America is drinking this woman's iniquity. In fact, her role to society lies a dee...
-
Ostend Street commented on Sarah Palin's cheat sheet:
Once a cheat always a cheat. Good comment!!!!!...
-
Ostend Street commented on Gen. Colin Powell now favors repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell":
@ivydevildog: I recommend, wholeheartedly that you read the book "Who Stole My Cheese"? The book ...
-
ivydevildog commented on Gen. Colin Powell now favors repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell":
To Ostend Street: Your obvious intellectual prowess is indeed impressive; your counterargument is ...
-
nhlanhla commented on Gen. Colin Powell now favors repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell":
Ivydevildog: no amount of praying will change this. Let free yourself. ...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright



MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2009-10-09 04:41:35
2009-10-09 05:21:44
Frank, you are understating the problem. First, I do believe it is counterproductive in 2009 to still have a BLACK or WHITE only college. Beyond ridiculous. I am also getting more convinced daily that the level of imposing conformity by university management is killing scholarship for business interest. Where in history was found ever a socially conforming intellectual - OF NOTE?
I am also convinced that with everyone with 21st century psyche trying to look the same, sound the same, feel the same, be the same - actions like PLAGIARISM at universities too will soon become COMPULSORY, especially at a stupidly led college like More-of-the-same-House.
2009-10-09 07:29:44
2009-10-09 09:03:22
2009-10-09 09:27:32
2009-10-09 09:34:50
2009-10-09 09:52:21
2009-10-09 09:52:33
2009-10-09 09:54:37
2009-10-09 11:31:32
2009-10-09 11:49:38
2009-10-09 11:59:50
2009-10-09 12:08:55
2009-10-09 12:13:10
2009-10-09 12:19:18
You worry about how you will find a job in a white culture, as opposed to worrying about how you can resist image-imperialism so that your kids can be themselves in whatever world they lived. You are worried about making corporate impressions as opposed to worrying about good human values that have nothing to do with appearance. You worry about saving your own skins and willing to allow a generational disappearance of diverse culturism, in manners, clothing, talk, or worship.
I swear if you lived outside that white and english cocoon world, you'd be the type of black people or parent who would rather have their kids speak pure and proper highbrow English language (if that exists) at the expense of learning and using their mother tongues in dominant positions of power.
Actually, you are what we call coconuts where I come from, I think you call your types, Orios.
Why would anyone still think it's respectable to look like Wall Street as opposed to themselves, when that is the place of real gangsters who live off grannies' pensions? What is wrong with looking like the Daile Lama, a Nigerian traditionalist, a rock star, YOUR bloody SELF, instead of looking like a wall street clone when going to lecture hall to learn about Anthropology, for instance? Self imposed and pointless victimhood that's what I see.
2009-10-09 12:29:19
2009-10-09 12:49:43
2009-10-09 14:02:59
2009-10-09 14:08:46
2009-10-09 14:09:19
2009-10-09 14:11:02
2009-10-09 14:11:03
2009-10-09 14:14:21
2009-10-09 14:27:08
2009-10-09 14:32:53
2009-10-09 14:43:18
2009-10-09 15:12:10
2009-10-09 15:17:36
It is not the right of a privileged majority to impose beliefs that are based in biased on a nonconforming group solely based on prejudices. Throughout the 2008-2009/2009-20010 school years, I have constantly heard the crys of the privilege majority at Morehouse College )the conforming heterosexual normative) that the homosexual population is destroying the image of the college by wearing women's garments. Without statistics, I can say the a majority of those whose cry of wolf I heard, maintained below outstanding grade point averages and I dare say will ever actually complete matriculation at Morehouse College.
Wake up! It is the content of a one's character that we should be judging here, not the contents of one's closet. This is merely a ploy of the current administration to recloset the homosexual population at Morehouse that have found themselves to be liberated enough to not be subjected to the tyranny of a majority. Robert Franklin, you sadly disappoint me. You might as well cry "weapons of mass destruction" to rally up a bandwagon of folks to support your underhanded schemes.
If a student is to be denied access to the classroom (be it at privately funded Morehouse College) based solely on their outward appearance, then we as a black community have become the evil force that we so outwardly fought during the Civil Rights movement, when blacks were denied access to white only privately owned counters, movie theatres and, private white only institutions of higher learning.
It is a sad day when a race of people that openly fought against the injustices that were imposed on them solely based on skin tone, have turned into the machine of oppression that they once cried out against. If the administration and Morehouse College herself, a supposed safe-haven for the educating and mentoring of young black men can pompously impose such a policy, then we should be in full support of privately funded Ivy League schools denying access to black students and the rest of mainstream America resubjecting us to the Jim Crow laws of the mid-1900s.
The current administration at Morehouse would have you believe that "great minds think alike" and that this policy is in the best interest of her students. I dare to counter that doctrine and say that "great minds think for themselves" and that this policy is detrimental to the individual development that makes the higher learning process worthwhile. College is not for learning to put on a suit-and-tie combination and bow your heads to what is subjugated to you by the tyranny of a majority. Oh No! It is just the opposite. It is for leaning to hold your head high with pride at for the individual that your maker created because you were created to be unique purposefully.
To quote Marianne Williamson, "Your playing small does not serve the world. There's nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you."
2009-10-09 15:34:32
To this other point, contrary to all of these out of sync opinions, college is a place for many things, most obvious of those is that it you go to receive an education. However, the notion that college serves only ONE purpose represents the most flawed and irresponsible of logics.
If you don't "find yourself" in college, at what point does that occur, high school or post college life? Colleges are chosen not just for the quality of education but also campus life as well. That includes reasonable freedoms of expression not enjoyed at other institutions such as Oral Roberts and like-minded ones.
Many "middle class" students from across the country often bring the cultures of their hometowns to college. That happens to include grills, sagging pants, manbags etc. I know I balked at seeing native New Yorkers wear oversized EVERYTHING in college but I shudder to think that my school would ban it just because it doesn't look good. If any person graduates from any college not knowing what to wear during an interview, then said college and individual are equally culpable in that.
If these same people of interest are currently employed while in school, what are the odds that they went to the interview wearing doo-rags, sagging pants, and thigh high boots? Slim to none. Yet, Morehouse needed this policy?
Yeah right and Jay from Next Model is a dime piece.
2009-10-09 16:18:01
2009-10-09 18:36:54
2009-10-09 19:00:13
2009-10-09 19:08:25
2009-10-09 19:33:42
2009-10-09 21:39:58
2009-10-10 00:09:18
2009-10-10 08:52:43
2009-10-10 12:26:48
2009-10-10 12:44:56
2009-10-10 14:34:04
2009-10-10 16:23:27
2009-10-10 17:51:32
2009-10-10 18:28:55
2009-10-10 23:21:12
2009-10-11 09:21:30
2009-10-11 12:45:58
til now, all who support this college are doing so for immediate and commercial job market gains. that's too much pity for me to entertain. but i do encourage you to stop being the job market BOX... as i would encourage any student enrolled for scholarship at a proper university - and not a black satellite military campus, like this moron-house college. i say it again let students dress up like priests, financial brokers, rock stars or jocks, for drama, history, economics, psychology or geology learning.
unless of course, and lord behold, this is actually a front aimed at curbing the prevalence and spread of homo and other deviant sexual identities and behaviours on a purely manly young black campus life. well, then of course, there, is a real topic and issue, as so far it has all seemed only mindless at the least.
2009-10-11 16:26:41
2009-10-11 21:59:59
2009-10-12 07:10:53
2009-10-12 08:43:07
2009-10-12 09:52:50
2009-10-12 10:42:21
2009-10-12 15:55:56
2009-10-12 16:43:33
2009-10-13 04:57:10
2009-10-13 09:12:17
Implementing a dress code appropriate for attending university functions is understandable. Implementing one because you don't "like" to see grills, men in women's clothing, and baggy pants is a nanny a university as you can get. Unless I am completely wrong, Morehouse does not have the open door policy found in many HBCU's. To me that means that you have to have certain "elements" working in your favor, academics and money being at the top.
From the sound of this shock and horror talk, Morehouse must troll the local jails looking for ignorant black male who then in turn fail the University. This must be the case. That or misplaced priorities and bigotry. The latter is more likely.
2009-10-13 12:42:36
2009-10-13 16:05:03
2009-10-13 17:30:21
2009-10-13 17:36:23
2009-10-13 19:29:27
2009-10-13 19:30:44
2009-10-13 21:42:46
2009-10-14 12:14:37
2009-10-15 00:15:17
2009-10-15 03:40:08
2009-10-15 03:50:58
I dont even see it in the Top 1000 of world leading universities. Instead of playing busy with dress, morehouse management must contribute to excellent teaching and research. A problem with some of us: is that we just love looking the part as opposed to acting it.
2009-10-15 04:21:06
2009-10-15 04:29:01
2009-10-15 04:30:09
2009-10-15 08:25:33
2009-10-15 12:01:03
In the real world, Morehouse's rich legacy has long since diminished as more and more black men choose to educate themselves at more prestigious nonblack colleges and universities. That's a fact. If you look at the current enrollment of young black men of significant accomplishments, very few are Morehouse students. If you look at the current number of black men of significant accomplishments, very few are HBCU grads and even less are Morehouse Grads.
If Morehouse believes banning men from wearing ballcaps in the school cafe is in their best interests, more power to them. While it may make some happy, I doubt the policy itself would attract a different breed of student. The days of the "Morehouse Man" has waned and believing that attending the school carries the same weight as it once had is counterproductive.
This is a feel good policy.
2009-10-15 15:33:52
2009-10-15 16:19:40
2009-10-15 17:20:57
Anon, according to the USNews report, Morehouse is a 3rd-tier school much like Roanoke and Wisconsin Lutheran Colleges. I never disagreed that Morehouse doesn't have a rich tradition and plenty of public recognition.
I've checked the college reviews and while Morehouse's marketing literature does accurately state that Morehouse "was" ranked as one of the top feeder schools, it was based on a 2003 study. If that is your the shining example of accomplishment, I would kindly direct you to the year 2009.
Bearing witness to a sea of black men in full academic regalia is nothing short of amazing. But it is what it is. Morehouse like most HBCU's is suffering and will continue to as more and more black men choose to pursue higher education at nonHBCU's.
So you will know, there is nothing remotely mysterious or intriguing about Morehouse. Good school and all but been there done that. Knowing the military-like structure the community has now adopted for its students, it is not a school I would suggest sending my son to. Looks like he's going to Howard after all
Damn!
2009-10-16 05:27:17
I could not want to be at Morehouse, I dont know where that college is located. I am not american nor in america. So stop shooting blanks.
2009-10-16 05:43:05
If dress code fascism is their only current claim to publicity, well then, that may explain Nosag as its output.
2009-10-16 05:48:58
2009-10-16 05:59:23
2009-10-16 07:16:01
2009-10-16 08:31:23
2009-10-16 09:02:39
2009-10-16 09:23:58
2009-10-16 09:23:58
2009-10-16 09:23:58
2009-10-16 10:26:33
2009-10-16 11:15:20
2009-10-16 13:43:23
The school's leadership must grow up and stop hate on GAY students, because actually that's the MESSAGE to your hypocritical and hateful rhetoric dressed up as "dress code".
And while at it, think about admitting young black women too? They do exist in the real world that you are so "apparently" bent over at mimicking.
"a newfound focus on research in key areas". Newly found for sure.
To me you seem like nothing but the silliest idea at a boys-only-high-school. But hey, thank God, I am not the only one who sees you for your mediocrity.
2009-10-16 17:13:02
2009-10-16 17:46:53
2009-10-16 18:29:40
and yes i'm not american nor in america. to be clear i wrote that to point out that, i could not physically be at Harvard nor some other white university, because someone else suggested that i was against MH merely because i was jealous because i had been bought at some other white institution as token black.
Anyway i'd say to you, beware you didn't ask me "Why are you here..." as though you were one of characters in that film "District 9". That would just be too far down the drain to come back from, dear MH graduate.
2009-10-16 18:50:45
2009-10-16 19:38:00
2009-10-17 11:23:43
Bullsh.it
I don't have a reason to harbor any hatred for a school that graduates more black men in one commencement ceremony than many collegs combined. How can you hate that? I don't like Morehouse's policy. I don't like Morehouse advocates telling others that they can't be critical of a Morehouse policy because they didn't attend the school. That's dumb.
This is an article about Morehouse that is not featured on a Morehouse website or blog. It's The Daily Voice. If you don't want nonMorehouse people voicing opinions on Morehouse-related issues, start your own secure blog requiring a password.
Until then, lose the sensitivity.
Ostend, it would more than likely save you from spiked blood pressure if you not only skip past my posts, but stop trying to comment about me and others you disagree with. No one is checking for your approval at the door. So do what you do best and blow on that!
2009-10-17 15:04:14
2009-10-17 17:55:32
2009-10-17 21:22:00
2009-10-17 21:24:16
2009-10-18 01:11:29
2009-10-18 02:45:17
2009-10-18 11:05:19
2009-10-18 15:46:54
2009-10-18 16:44:52
is a great pity what years of oppression can do to the psyche of the once oppressed as they get on the road to becoming the new oppressors with great zeal.
2009-10-18 17:19:41
2009-10-19 11:01:25
2009-10-19 16:31:54
2009-10-19 17:59:49
2009-10-19 21:19:31
2009-10-20 11:00:22
2009-10-20 13:50:09
Put me in the camp that thinks this dress code is over-kill and insulting.
First of all college age men (and women for that matter) shouldn't need to be told how to dress. I'd take it as a personal insult if I were a Morehouse man.
Secondly, if the young men at Morehouse are committing these alleged fashion faux pas'simply mandating that they stop is more likely to create resentment rather than foster the kind of change in mentality that I presume the policy aims to promote.
Thirdly, for those arguing that the school is simply preparing Morehouse men for the rules of appropriate attire in the corporate world, I say hog-wash. Give me a break. Are you seriously suggesting that young men who were bright enough to get into Morehouse, don't have sense enough to know that sagging jeans, do-rags and bare feet are not appropriate attire in a corporate work environment? I'm sure every college student knows that the clothes they wear to class sometimes wouldn't fly in their chosen profession. I know sometimes I wore shorts, old jeans, t-shirts abd sweat suits to class and I didn't need a dress code to know that such attire was not appropriate for an interview or to wear to work in my chosen field.
I would also add for those pushing the preparation for the work world argument, college is the time when young people should be free to find themselves, express themselves, and have the room to fully explore who they are and who they hope to become. There's time enough to conform to the strictures of the corporate world -- I definitely don't see the need nor the benefit of imposing these kinds of constraints on college kids any sooner than it's necessary. Young people need to take full advantage of the freedom afforded during the college years.
I encourage the men of Morehouse to band together and demand an end to the dress code as an insult to to their intelligence. I say this as someone who cringes when I see young men sagging or wearing glitz on their teeth. I'm surprised the dress code didn't say anything about tatoos -- that's another thing I personally don't care for. Despite my distaste for these things I don't think you change anyone's mind or their mentality by becoming the fashion police and forcing them to conform to your taste. That's not the way to do it IMO.
2009-10-20 14:03:13
2009-10-20 14:20:13
That piece would show that the actual problem there relates to some of the unwelcome gay students' dress sense
The piece signaled disapproval, if not outrage, from a section of the MH community against some gay boys who stretched the gender lines in their dress expression
And then months later here comes a dress ban
Who is stupid enough not to realise the most probably causality.
I am just surprised no one has referred to that history til now.
I normally care a little about dress codes: but my seething here comes from the gay connection (or rather, disconnection and exclusion) and the fact that this is supposedly an academic institution. Not only is this dishonesty but it is also repression, and worse this is done at an institution whose objectives must be to seek and promote truth against both these outcomes sought by the formulation process and implementation of such a policy.
It has little or nothing to do with the corporate world preparation, although I'd also have problems with that too. But not as acidic as I have against such a blatant lie.
2009-10-20 14:25:47
2009-10-20 14:52:40
Were not these your very words to somebody else right here?
Don't flatter yourself Midwest Guy. I quit reading your post months ago but if the shoe fits wear it. No one including me asked for your sorry chatter. Morehouse will continue to exist with or without you. If it doesn't exist then so be it. Your ego is showing.
Now, congeniality is a nice to have, but some incidents and occasions just should not allow it. Not even its fake version a.k.a. rhetorical points.
2009-10-20 16:07:16
2009-10-20 16:08:42
Robin I understand you fully. I also asked above whether Morehouse trolled the local jails looking for students. I didn't understand how this had become such a major issue after the students had already been accepted. So maybe the issue is really is what the students wear rather than where they came from which is what some of the posters suggest.
Some time ago Gerren Gaynor (fellow Morehouse student) wrote a rather provoking article where he expressed his discontent with the manner in which gay morehouse students choose to dress. Here's a snipet of his remarks:
Needless to say his comments did not elicit much support. He was called a homophobe among other things by many, including Ostend. Oh how times have changed.
2009-10-20 18:13:56
2009-10-20 20:27:01
2009-10-21 04:35:53
Some of you people are just as pathetic as the right wing.
I could never say: I am sorry, I am gay.
2009-10-21 04:43:34
2009-10-21 13:50:51
2009-10-21 16:09:35
2009-10-21 16:28:52
2009-10-21 18:25:28
2009-10-21 23:43:43
2009-10-22 00:04:34
2009-10-22 04:59:04
2009-10-22 04:59:04
2009-10-22 04:59:04
2009-10-22 05:12:49
While Morehouse is defending their new policy as a measure to protect the school’s reputation — many find the new dress code to be homophobic and discriminatory to the school’s gay population. This perception has been further strengthened after Dr. William Bynum, the school’s Vice President of Student Services, had this to say, “We are talking about five students who are living a gay lifestyle that is leading them to dress a way we do not expect in Morehouse men.”
Of course the policy was always a disguised attempt to trim the frills of a few silly frocks.
Also ironic is that most gay students supported the policy.
Trust the gay men who would be rather die than be caught in the company of effeminate, let alone cross dressing, men. And of course the intersex dont exist for these small minded fear ridden wimps
It's like living in the hey day where light skinned or mixed race blacks could never make friends with tar-baby blacks.
2009-10-22 07:09:23
2009-10-22 09:36:47
2009-10-22 17:16:03
2009-10-23 12:03:18
2009-10-23 13:23:40
2009-10-27 05:51:27
2009-10-27 18:58:38
2009-10-28 00:17:14
2009-10-28 01:14:15
2009-11-13 21:28:25
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com